Quick Summary
Trump’s new tariff wave targets 14 countries including Japan, South Korea, and Thailand.
Talks with India are “close to done,” but big issues like agriculture and dairy remain unsolved.
India wants better US market access for footwear, garments, and leather.
What Just Happened?
On July 8, 2025, US President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on 14 countries, including key Asian partners. But in the same breath, he claimed the US was “close to making a deal with India.”
While other nations are being hit with new duty hikes, India remains at the negotiation table — but it’s not giving in easily.
“We’re close to making a deal with India... Others, we don’t think we’ll be able to,” Trump said at a White House press event.
India isn’t ready to accept any deal that:
Opens up its dairy and agriculture markets to US imports
Ignores reciprocal tariff cuts on Indian exports like textiles, footwear, and leather
Trump’s Tariff Tactic: A Global Squeeze
Trump’s strategy is clear: reward countries that sign deals, and penalize those that don’t. Countries like Bangladesh, Japan, South Korea, and Thailand now face steep new tariffs starting August 1.
This is classic Trump trade playbook — use tariffs as leverage.
Trump’s message: Sign a trade deal, or pay the price.
India’s Red Lines: Agriculture, Dairy, and GM Crops
Despite US pressure, India isn’t ready to compromise on key domestic sectors:
The US wants Indian markets opened to American dairy products, including those from genetically modified cattle.
India says no — and for good reason:
Most dairy in India comes from small farmers
Allowing US imports could collapse local prices and hurt rural incomes
Food safety standards and religious sensitivities are also big factors
India has consistently excluded agriculture from Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), including with ASEAN, the UK, and the EU.
Opening this sector to the US would mean doing the same with others — a move India sees as risky and unfair.
US negotiators are pushing for India to allow genetically modified (GM) food products.
But India views this as a threat to both food safety and seed sovereignty — an issue farmers’ groups have repeatedly protested.
India’s Ask: Give Us Fair Access for Job-Creating Exports
India is pushing hard to get better access to the US market for its labour-intensive sectors, including:
These sectors are critical for employment, especially for semi-skilled workers and women in urban and peri-urban areas.
India wants:
Tariff reductions or eliminations on these products
Removal of non-tariff barriers (like certification red tape)
Long-term export guarantees for predictability
Negotiators are reportedly narrowing the deal to a “mini trade agreement” focused on reciprocal tariff cuts, not a full FTA.
Cut in tariffs on select US manufacturing goods
Better market access for Indian textiles & footwear
Easier licensing for US tech firms
Streamlining of customs procedures
No agreement yet on agriculture or GM foods
Services and digital trade mostly left out
Why This Deal Matters
The goal from both sides is clear:
Double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 (currently around $200 billion).
But without a solid deal:
Indian exporters will struggle with high US duties
US companies will lose access to India’s growing middle class market
Political tensions could rise — especially if tariffs extend to India later
“Without tariff relief on job-creating goods, India sees little benefit in signing the deal,” said a former Indian trade negotiator to NDTV Profit.
India’s Balancing Act: Jobs vs. Pressure
India is playing a calculated game:
Stay open to talks, but don’t compromise on rural livelihoods
Negotiate tariff access where it helps job growth
Use time and diplomacy to reduce long-term exposure to US pressure
Giving in to US demands on agriculture might force India’s hand with other trade partners, like the EU or Australia, who would demand the same access.
Domestic Politics: Why India Can’t Give In Easily
Agriculture may be just 16% of GDP — but it supports half the population.
In a country where elections are always near, any move that affects farmers can trigger protests, political backlash, or even coalition risks.
No Indian government, especially in an election year, can afford to be seen as “selling out” farmers for a trade deal.
Key Takeaways
Trump is using tariffs as a negotiating weapon in global trade — India is resisting, but still talking.
India is standing firm on protecting farmers, banning GM crops, and preserving food safety.
A mini deal focused on textiles, footwear, and reciprocal tariff cuts could happen — but not without concessions on both sides.
The outcome of the US elections may change the trade dynamics entirely — India is watching carefully.
Final Word
This isn’t just a story about Trump’s tariffs.
It’s a bigger battle over fair trade, domestic priorities, and global power equations.
India may be “close” to a deal — but not at any cost.
The next few weeks will test how well India can hold its ground while keeping doors open.
Read also: Vietnam’s 20% US Tariff Shock: What It Means for India’s Trade Strategy