In a move that’s rattled Asian export markets, the United States has slapped a flat 20% tariff on all Vietnamese goods, replacing a decades-old trade agreement that had once helped Vietnam become a global export powerhouse.
While the headlines focus on Vietnam, the ripple effects go much further — and India is right in the splash zone. A recent report from the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) is urging Indian policymakers to take this shift seriously as they finalize their own trade talks with Washington.
Here’s what’s changed, why it matters, and how India can respond
Until now, Vietnam enjoyed preferential access to the US market under a 2000 Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). This allowed key exports — textiles, footwear, seafood, and furniture — to enter at reduced tariff rates (2–10%).
But under a new deal announced by former US President Donald Trump, those benefits are gone. Instead:
A flat 20% tariff applies to all Vietnamese exports to the US.
A punitive 40% tariff targets goods that are manufactured elsewhere (especially China) but routed through Vietnam — a move meant to crack down on transshipment.
Key stat: Vietnam’s exports to the US grew from $800 million in 2001 to over $135 billion in 2023. That growth is now at risk.
This isn’t just about two countries changing trade terms. It’s a clear sign that the US is rewriting trade rules in Asia, and tariffs are back in the toolkit.
More importantly, it shows how quickly a reliable trade partner like Vietnam can face a harsh reversal. For India, this is a reality check.
India is currently negotiating its own trade arrangement with the US. And while better access to American markets is tempting, the Vietnam case shows that deals can be re-written — fast and unilaterally.
According to GTRI, India should be especially cautious about:
Flat duty structures that ignore sector-specific needs.
Lack of clarity on rules of origin, which can trigger disputes.
Sudden tariff reversals that can hurt long-term exporters.
Here’s a quick comparison to understand the shift:
This shift can open up some opportunities — but also introduces new risks.
Vietnam’s loss of cost advantage makes Indian goods more competitive in textiles, seafood, and furniture.
Buyers looking to diversify supply chains away from China + Vietnam may turn to India.
India can promote itself as a reliable trade partner with strong domestic manufacturing.
The US could demand reciprocal concessions in services or digital trade.
Any deal lacking clear rules of origin could backfire if India becomes a transshipment hub.
A flat tariff system, if imposed later, could hurt specific high-performing sectors.
Vietnam's textile industry thrived on low tariffs. Now, a 20% levy can hurt margins and order volumes.
India’s textile exporters, especially those in Tiruppur, Ludhiana, and Surat, could benefit if they’re prepared to scale up and meet compliance.
Action Point: Government must invest in export readiness programs and quick infrastructure support to help Indian firms capture lost Vietnam share.
Trade experts say the new US-Vietnam deal — especially the 40% penalty for routing Chinese goods — could violate WTO rules.
Why? Because routing doesn’t always change the product’s origin, and penalizing it may breach global norms. If challenged, it could lead to disputes that reshape how rules of origin are interpreted across Asia.
India’s Takeaway: Don’t sign any trade deal without solid WTO-compatible clauses — or risk being dragged into future disputes.
Trump’s strategy (and possibly the next administration’s too) shows a shift:
Less focus on multilateral agreements (like WTO).
More emphasis on bilateral deals that are transactional and tariff-based.
Tariffs are being used as a weapon in geopolitics — not just economics.
Here’s a checklist Indian policymakers and exporters can use:
Push for sector-wise tariff models instead of flat rates.
Insist on clearly defined rules of origin.
Add exit clauses or review mechanisms in case of unfair tariff hikes.
Avoid over-dependence on a single market (like the US).
Build WTO-compliant safeguards.
Watch for supply chain gaps left by Vietnam in the US.
Step up compliance standards to meet US buyer expectations.
Invest in capacity building for export volume spikes.
Partner with government trade bodies for support and early signals.
Deals like the US-Vietnam one are no longer just about trade — they’re about power, strategy, and supply chain control. For India, this is not just a warning shot — it’s a moment to shape a resilient, forward-looking export strategy that doesn’t get caught off guard.
Read also: Nothing Phone (3) with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 & All-50MP Cameras: India Launch Highlights